Alwaght | News & Analysis Website

Editor's Choice

News

Most Viewed

Day Week Month

In Focus

Ansarullah

Ansarullah

A Zaidi Shiite movement operating in Yemen. It seeks to establish a democratic government in Yemen.
Shiite

Shiite

represents the second largest denomination of Islam. Shiites believe Ali (peace be upon him) to be prophet"s successor in the Caliphate.
Resistance

Resistance

Axis of Resistances refers to countries and movements with common political goal, i.e., resisting against Zionist regime, America and other western powers. Iran, Syria, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and Hamas in Palestine are considered as the Axis of Resistance.
Persian Gulf Cooperation Council

Persian Gulf Cooperation Council

A regional political u n i o n consisting of Arab states of the Persian Gulf, except for Iraq.
Taliban

Taliban

Taliban is a Sunni fundamentalist movement in Afghanistan. It was founded by Mohammed Omar in 1994.
  Wahhabism & Extremism

Wahhabism & Extremism

Wahhabism is an extremist pseudo-Sunni movement, which labels non-Wahhabi Muslims as apostates thus paving the way for their bloodshed.
Kurds

Kurds

Kurds are an ethnic group in the Middle East, mostly inhabiting a region, which spans adjacent parts of Iran, Iraq, Syria, and Turkey. They are an Iranian people and speak the Kurdish languages, which form a subgroup of the Northwestern Iranian branch of Iranian languages.
NATO

NATO

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization is an intergovernmental military alliance based on the North Atlantic Treaty which was signed on 4 April 1949.
Islamic Awakening

Islamic Awakening

Refers to a revival of the Islam throughout the world, that began in 1979 by Iranian Revolution that established an Islamic republic.
Al-Qaeda

Al-Qaeda

A militant Sunni organization founded by Osama bin Laden at some point between 1988 and 1989
New node

New node

Map of  Latest Battlefield Developments in Syria and Iraq on
alwaght.net

US Seeks End to Syria War to Serve Its Own Interests

Tuesday 3 November 2015
US Seeks End to Syria War to Serve Its Own Interests

Alwaght- If ever American efforts to end the Syrian conflict were in effect, now is the time to address these attempts and unveil the inconsistency of Washington’s policies toward Damascus and the war that has befell it.

From Afghanistan, to Iraq, to Libya, history stands witness to the United States’ approach to foreign conflicts. At the helm is its involvement in sparking the problem and then adhering to the issue with problem-solving strategies to emerge as the hero who came to the rescue when all it would be rescuing is its own interests.

The Syria scenario is no different. While the US has repeated its war mistakes; first, by going against public opinion, and then by assuming that President Bashar Assad would not put up a fight against foreign-backed terrorists, Washington is now trying to mend Syria’s broken wing with placebo.

On Friday, the White House announced it will send around 50 Special Operations troops to northern Syria and increase air assets in Turkey purportedly to step up the fight against ISIS.

On the same day, US Secretary of State John Kerry was in Vienna in a bid to strike an agreement on a plan for a political transition in Syria through a transitional government, the drafting of a constitution, and UN-supervised elections. However, since the proposal stipulated the removal of Assad within months it was rejected by Syria’s allies, namely Russia and Iran.

“The Vienna Communique - issued on Friday October by 17 countries, the United Nations and the European Union - provides a diplomatic framework for peace in Syria. In this document, the external powers who have poured weapons, fighters and money into a disastrous and failed “regime change” policy in Syria for more than four years have signed on to what could be a realistic basis for peace,” Global Research, a centre for research on Globalization wrote.

Critics have slammed the United States’ double-faced policies toward Syria which on the one hand, is pledging 100 million dollars to militant groups and on the other is looking for a political solution. Although muddled, the US is taking steps to end the Syrian crisis.

The motives, however, are hidden beneath layers of diplomatic talk of a solution that would ease the suffering of the Syrian people and bring back stability to the region. It all goes back to in-house American politics.

The Democrats represented by US President Barack Obama are making the most of what little time remains before elections to score another seeming victory for Washington. The Obama administration already prides itself with striking a historical nuclear deal with the Islamic Republic of Iran and finding a solution for the war in Syria would add to its list of accomplishments.

To avert losing ground in the Syria battlefield of international players with Russian-Iranian measures unravelling day by day in the two countries’ fight against extremism, the White House is swallowing a bitter pill.

Having expressed fury at Russia’s military involvement in the Syrian war, the US was finally forced to accede to the developing actuality. The Russians had already been deployed and there was nothing the US could do to prevent it that would not have led to an all-out call for bloodshed.

However, the democrats face an internal obstacle which is the warmongering ideologies of the Republicans who have always tried to take advantage of any possible war and therefore are against a diplomatic solution to the Syrian predicament.

Another reason for their anti-diplomacy stance is the eternal struggle with their rivals, the Democrats. A political solution to the Syria crisis under Obama’s tenure would fall against their interests because it would mark a point against them.

Given the disconnect between US military and diplomatic efforts, it will not be surprising if both are failures,” an analysis on The Washington Post predicted. This forecast speaks volumes. Despite the United States’ efforts to end the Syrian crisis for its own interests, the duplicitous strategies it is implementing will unlikely lead the destination at the end of the long and rocky road.

Tags :

Comments
Name :
Email :
* Text :
Send

Gallery

Photo

Film

Commemorating the 36th anniversary of the passing of Imam Khomeini (RA), the founder of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Commemorating the 36th anniversary of the passing of Imam Khomeini (RA), the founder of the Islamic Republic of Iran.