Alwaght | News & Analysis Website

Editor's Choice

News

Most Viewed

Day Week Month

In Focus

Ansarullah

Ansarullah

A Zaidi Shiite movement operating in Yemen. It seeks to establish a democratic government in Yemen.
Shiite

Shiite

represents the second largest denomination of Islam. Shiites believe Ali (peace be upon him) to be prophet"s successor in the Caliphate.
Resistance

Resistance

Axis of Resistances refers to countries and movements with common political goal, i.e., resisting against Zionist regime, America and other western powers. Iran, Syria, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and Hamas in Palestine are considered as the Axis of Resistance.
Persian Gulf Cooperation Council

Persian Gulf Cooperation Council

A regional political u n i o n consisting of Arab states of the Persian Gulf, except for Iraq.
Taliban

Taliban

Taliban is a Sunni fundamentalist movement in Afghanistan. It was founded by Mohammed Omar in 1994.
  Wahhabism & Extremism

Wahhabism & Extremism

Wahhabism is an extremist pseudo-Sunni movement, which labels non-Wahhabi Muslims as apostates thus paving the way for their bloodshed.
Kurds

Kurds

Kurds are an ethnic group in the Middle East, mostly inhabiting a region, which spans adjacent parts of Iran, Iraq, Syria, and Turkey. They are an Iranian people and speak the Kurdish languages, which form a subgroup of the Northwestern Iranian branch of Iranian languages.
NATO

NATO

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization is an intergovernmental military alliance based on the North Atlantic Treaty which was signed on 4 April 1949.
Islamic Awakening

Islamic Awakening

Refers to a revival of the Islam throughout the world, that began in 1979 by Iranian Revolution that established an Islamic republic.
Al-Qaeda

Al-Qaeda

A militant Sunni organization founded by Osama bin Laden at some point between 1988 and 1989
New node

New node

Map of  Latest Battlefield Developments in Syria and Iraq on
alwaght.net
Interview

Pashinyan Cause of Polarization, No Chances for Coup in Armenia: Expert

Friday 5 March 2021
Pashinyan Cause of Polarization, No Chances for Coup in Armenia: Expert

Alwaght- Several months after the peace deal between Azerbaijan and Armenia to end the Karabakh dispute, the repercussions of the crisis remain impacting the political scene in Yerevan. Since the very beginning of peace agreement, a significant part of the citizens and political factions blamed the Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan as the main cause of defeat and his acceptance of peace as a betrayal of the country. The situation has developed to an extent that opposition parties and senior military officials are demanding the resignation of the PM.

Even in the middle of this critical situation, the opposition of President Armen Sargsyan to the PM decision to dismiss the army chief has pushed the political mayhem to alarming levels.

Alwaght has talked to Hasan Beheshtipour, a Central Asian and Caucasus affairs expert, asking him questions about the current and future political situation in Armenia.

Pashinyan, cause of Armenian polarization

Shedding light on the current political crisis in Armenia, Mr Beheshtipour said that the Armenian political community with election of Pashinyan in 2018 was polarized into two parts. After years of rule of the Karabakhi politicians, for the first time an individual came to power who was not one of them. The presence of Serzh Sargsyan in the post of PM kept the power in the hand of the Karabakhi politicians for years, especially that the president post was largely ceremonial.

“Since Pashinyan premiership, the society was officially divided into two poles and the defeat of the country sustained in the recent Karabakh war even deepened this polarization. That is, some remained loyal to Pashinyan and others blamed him for the defeat in the war. This exchange of blames came while the entire political system in the country was involved in the failure, not just one individual.”

Army chief meddling broadened the crisis

“Looking at the facts on the ground, it should be noted that Armenia illegally occupied about 7 regions in the 1990s, which was not recognized by the international community. The defeat in Karabakh war has now caused another political crisis in the country like the fire under the ashes. Meanwhile, the intervention of the Chief of General Staff of the country's army Onik Gasparyan has further caused the crisis to escalate.”

According to the Armenian constitution, intervention in the politics of the military personnel is banned. The PM also has no power to sack the army chief and this is one of the powers of the president.

Europe and Russia support Pashinyan government stay

The analyst continued that in the current situation, despite the pervasive crisis in Armenia, European countries, the US, and even Russia support the continuation of Pashinyan government. From the point of view of Europe and the US, Pashinyan is a figure close to the West, and the continuation of his premiership should be endorsed. In the eyes of the Russians, too, the current PM, as the endorser and main supporter of the Nagorno-Karabakh peace, must remain in power.

“All in all, Pashinyan currently has significant support both internally and externally, so it can be suggested that the time for his quitting the power has not come yet.”

Still, we should take into account that everything is possible in the politics, and there may be a scenario to remove him from power, Mr Beheshtipour said, adding that either the incumbent PM remains in power or another one replaces them, Karabakh crisis should be resolved principally. The solution on the one hand should recognize Azerbaijan sovereignty and on the other hand consider Armenian claims to Karabakh. Although this is hardly likely, finding such a formula is possible.

Army coup against Pashinyan without Moscow green light difficult

In the closing comments of the interview, Mr Beheshtipour talked about the possibility of a coup against the PM, saying that in the politics everything is possible. But coup in Armenia requires home and foreign support. We should focus, more than any other actor, on Russia. Moscow has substantial sway over Yerevan and this means that a coup unsupported by the Kremlin is somehow unlikely in Armenia.

“It should be known that a military coup will not solve any problem and would only mean finding a victim to the war defeat. In other words, a coup will put the whole blame on Pashinyan. Even if a coup takes place in Armenia, which is unlikely, the military personnel can hold the power for three months at the maximum and then an election should be immediately held.”

 

Tags :

Armenia Pashinyan Coup Crisis War Defeat

Comments
Name :
Email :
* Text :
Send

Gallery

Photo

Film

Dozens of Palestinians Injured in Israeli Forces Attack on Anti-Settlement Rallies

Dozens of Palestinians Injured in Israeli Forces Attack on Anti-Settlement Rallies