Alwaght- Is the story of tracking terrorists and launching pre-emptive war all over the world to "protect the American homeland," a true one or an excuse to justify an American military agenda?
Some analysts believe that ISIS terrorist group is created by CIA, and Washington's "anti-terrorism" agenda in Iraq and Syria comprises providing financial and military support for terrorists. They also believe that ISIS’s invasion of Iraqi cities in June 2014 was just part of carefully planned military-intelligence operation receiving a confidential support from the US, NATO and Israeli regime.
Indeed, ISIS, like Al Qaeda, is a US hand-made creature, a terror tool shaped to divide and conquer the oil-rich Middle East and to face the growing Iranian influence in the region. The US government uses ISIS in three ways: to attack its enemies in the Middle East, to serve as an excuse for U.S. military intervention abroad, and at home to provoke an artificial local threat, used to justify the extraordinary expansion of invasive domestic surveillance.
As evidence, they say that when the ISIS was rampaging throughout Syrian, the US government had nothing to do with that. Moreover, its push into Iraq was anticipated, as early as February 2014 it was already predicted that ISIS would attempt to take territories in Iraq, and the US government did not act to stop them. Obama himself admitted that his government did nothing with this regard, because any intervention would have taken pressure off of former Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri Al-Maliki. Therefore, the US government has exploited the rise of ISIS in order to obtain the geopolitical goal of pressuring Maliki, and Syrian president Bashar al-Assad to step down.
Moreover, several Iraqi government officials have accused the US of dropping weapons and military equipment into the hands of ISIS militants in different Iraqi provinces. Majid al-Ghraoui, a member of the Security and Defense Committee revealed that the information about the alleged weapons drop-off has reached the committee. Al-Sumaria News quoted Majid al- Ghraoui: “The US government is the prime suspect of supporting the terrorist group ISIS, and some media reported from officials of the militias, which are working with the Iraqi Army, that US coalition dropped combat arms by parachutes in the regions ISIS militants occupy.”
Al-Ghraoui remarked that US coalition aircrafts dropped weapon shipments in cities such as Eastern Khadira, and Balad in the Southern region of Salahuddin Province.
He added that the security and defense committee of the Iraqi House is to receive the reports of Operations headquarter, Ministry of Interior, and Ministry of Defense about the military support ISIS received from American aircrafts in Salahuddin province, and subsequent actions will be taken.
Mofeed Al Baldawi, the governor of Balad city, announced on Saturday that combat arm shipments were dropped for active ISIS terrorist militants in the southern region of Salahuddin Province, and hundreds of residents have seen this cargo possessed by the terrorists.
Several Iraqi media groups aired on Friday footage of an international coalition aircraft releasing its military cargo in areas of Khadira city seized by ISIS terrorist militants.
Therefore it not Irrational to conclude that tThe American “anti-terrorism” strategy is only a hit of imagination; US is the number one sponsoring state of terrorism in the world, and ISIS and other terrorist groups in the region enjoy the protection of Us government and its allies. If these powers sought elimination of ISIS militants, they would have targeted their Toyota convoys when they crossed the desert from Syria to Iraq in June. The Syrian-Arab Sahara is an open ground, and with the availability of fighter jets, the attack, from a military point of view, would have been a quick justified surgery.
ISIS went onto consolidate its holdings further into Iraq, to threaten later on the Kurdish region Irbil and US-allies in the region; including Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Jordan. These intimidations pushed the US to initiate its bombing campaign, to guarantee that ISIS wouldn’t get unleashed. Obama was fine with ISIS rampaging through Iraq, killing civilians and pressuring Maliki to resign, until they threatened western oil interests in Irbil and their Arab allies.
Thus, the purpose of these airstrikes is only to define boundaries for ISIS militants, and not to eliminate them. Many military experts have questioned the US-led airstrikes as “ineffective”. For instance, ISIS terrorist are being tipped off weeks in advance to the US airstrikes, as CNN reported in September 2014.
These incidents prove that the US government does not operate to eliminate ISIS’s danger, but rather to control it and prevent it from introducing any damage to the US, and its allies, interests. The US can restrict these terrorist groups through closing ISIS’s financial and military nourishing canals, but Obama’s government in this context took no serious actions yet.
