Alwaght- Syria land of a major confluence of the world superpowers seeking to achieve a new world order, is believed to be the battleground of a proxy war between the US and Russia.
While Washington and Moscow may have been thought of the major player of the conflict but there you can find other players within the international system participating; as a proxy war between Saudi Arabia and other regional countries is ongoing in Syria.
The Syrian crisis is significant because finding a settlement for the nuclear deal of Iran with the world powers could be considered as an important step towards building an appropriate atmosphere for establishment of the future new world order in line with a an American vision and interpretation. Washington is striving after building a world in which it takes over as a security leader and the other five global powers are tasked with its management.
Therefore, it must be taken into consideration that the US is now implementing its Middle Eastern policy in central Syria and sees the its result which is rise of “uni-multi-polar” world that is supposed to appear after conclusion of the new world order.
In this Washington’s approach, the US manages the security of the world, and the operation fronts of its leadership are given to the international players to deal with. So, it could be concluded that the US performance in Syria aims at arranging a balance of power between the regional and international players with the objective of firming up Washington’s global security leadership. To this end, it engages into the game all of the regional and transregional players.
The Kurds are not an exception in this game. Actually, not only the Kurds but also even the opponents of US policy are sometimes used to help lay down the tracks for the American movement.
It also must be taken into account that the US has to take three major steps in West Asia region, both of them were, so far, taken: insecurity management in the region, arranging the balance of weakness in the region, and restoring partial security and stability to the region. These three steps are tied to the way of play the regional powers, specifically Iran, would have in the future with the US. This to a large extent could influence the future happenings.
Just contrary to the analyses which suggest that Washington eyes partitioning the embattled Syria, the split of the region is not a totally favorable scenario for the Americans, but, it is considered a partial plan and favor of the US. Partitioning of Syria, Iraq and also Saudi Arabia takes places when the US decides to entrust, after weighing up its security considerations, management of these partitioned regions to its “rival ally” the EU. This is coming while the Americans have not yet finalized their calculations on transition from the Arab Middle East region to the Persian Gulf and Iranian Plateau. In fact, their main challenge to reach this status is Tehran.
So, it appears that Washington does not want to allow Syria and the vicinity around it to be splitted for the time being, because such a partitioning could affect the “golden belt” and so make it go out of control.
