Alwaght | News & Analysis Website

Editor's Choice

News

Most Viewed

Day Week Month

In Focus

Ansarullah

Ansarullah

A Zaidi Shiite movement operating in Yemen. It seeks to establish a democratic government in Yemen.
Shiite

Shiite

represents the second largest denomination of Islam. Shiites believe Ali (peace be upon him) to be prophet"s successor in the Caliphate.
Resistance

Resistance

Axis of Resistances refers to countries and movements with common political goal, i.e., resisting against Zionist regime, America and other western powers. Iran, Syria, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and Hamas in Palestine are considered as the Axis of Resistance.
Persian Gulf Cooperation Council

Persian Gulf Cooperation Council

A regional political u n i o n consisting of Arab states of the Persian Gulf, except for Iraq.
Taliban

Taliban

Taliban is a Sunni fundamentalist movement in Afghanistan. It was founded by Mohammed Omar in 1994.
  Wahhabism & Extremism

Wahhabism & Extremism

Wahhabism is an extremist pseudo-Sunni movement, which labels non-Wahhabi Muslims as apostates thus paving the way for their bloodshed.
Kurds

Kurds

Kurds are an ethnic group in the Middle East, mostly inhabiting a region, which spans adjacent parts of Iran, Iraq, Syria, and Turkey. They are an Iranian people and speak the Kurdish languages, which form a subgroup of the Northwestern Iranian branch of Iranian languages.
NATO

NATO

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization is an intergovernmental military alliance based on the North Atlantic Treaty which was signed on 4 April 1949.
Islamic Awakening

Islamic Awakening

Refers to a revival of the Islam throughout the world, that began in 1979 by Iranian Revolution that established an Islamic republic.
Al-Qaeda

Al-Qaeda

A militant Sunni organization founded by Osama bin Laden at some point between 1988 and 1989
New node

New node

Map of  Latest Battlefield Developments in Syria and Iraq on
alwaght.net
Report

American Institute Blames “Diplomatic Short-sightedness” for Empowering Hezbollah

Saturday 13 August 2016
American Institute Blames “Diplomatic Short-sightedness” for Empowering Hezbollah

Diplomatic calls for ceasefire deemed a mistake. (Reuters)

The American Enterprise Institute has blamed the diplomatic short-sightedness of the US and UN during the 2006 war for Hezbollah’s empowerment in the past decade.

Alwaght- The American Enterprise Institute (AEI) has published a report in which it blamed the international community’s push for a ceasefire during the July 2006 war on Lebanon, saying the pressure further empowered Hezbollah resistance movement.

The institute labeled calls for an immediate cessation of hostilities after Israeli warplanes heavily pounded Lebanon and left a bloody trail behind, as “diplomatic short-sightedness.”

“Eventually, diplomats got their wish. The United States joined the international chorus calling on Israel to stand down, no matter that Hezbollah still posed a potent threat,” Michael Rubin writes.

On August 11, 2006, the UN Security Council unanimously adopted Resolution 1701. It called for a ceasefire and claimed “there will be no weapons or authority in Lebanon other than the Lebanese state.

AEI regretted that this resolution ended the 33-day war on Lebanon that claimed lives of more than 1,000 Lebanese and injured thousands of others, not to mention the amount of destruction it resulted in. It sees that were it not for the ceasefire, Hezbollah would have been weakened, if not destroyed, by the Israelis. That’s why it points the finger at politicians who made a diplomatic blunder in 2006 that appears to have come at a great cost.

“Ten years on, it’s perhaps wise to sit back and consider the price of a premature ceasefire.  Today, analysts and experts place Hezbollah’s arsenal at between 120,000 and 130,000 rockets and missiles. Whereas in 2006, Hezbollah could only strike northern Israel, today their rockets and missiles can imperil every inch of the Jewish state,” Rubin disappointedly expresses.

Contrary to what the institute claims, Hezbollah’s power today is not directly linked to this decision, however objectionable it may have been for the Israelis. Even if there were no international decision to end the war, and the Israelis continued to batter Lebanon, the resistance would have emerged triumphant. In fact, it seems that the resolution did the Israelis a favour, to save them from further embarrassment and a lot of money as well.

In addition, the resolution to disarm the resistance was also an obstacle that was thrown in front of Hezbollah. Little did they know that it would only strengthen its resolve.

“No army in the world will force us to drop our weapons, force us to surrender our arms, as long as people believe in this resistance,” Hezbollah Secretary-General Sayyid Hassan Nasrallah had affirmed.

To say that US President George W. Bush and his administration had helped the resistance grow is unreasonable. Hezbollah is a “formidable force” today first and foremost because it has persisted and stood before the most powerful entities in the world by maintaining the one element that inspires it to do so: faith.

Indeed, Iran has played a major role in reinforcing Hezbollah through arms supplies, training, and political endorsement but one cannot give credit to the so-called “fickleness of diplomats” for strengthening the group. Washington, at that time, certainly did not hesitate to stand by the Israeli regime against all else.  

“There would be no Sword of Damocles hanging over the region,” the institute states were it not for the diplomatic turn that forced the Israelis to halt its aggression against Lebanon.

Again this claim is baseless. However, it is true that in the span of a decade, Hezbollah has significantly improved its arsenal, strategies, and man power.

A report published on Haaretz extensively covered Hezbollah’s evolvement throughout the years explaining that the number of its reserve fighters has increased exponentially since 2006, that the group possesses tens of thousands short-range missiles, thousands of medium-range missiles, and hundreds of long-range missiles in addition to other advanced weapons. Most importantly, Hezbollah can strike anywhere in the Israeli regime.

“Alas, because of decisions a decade ago, the question is not whether a new Israel-Hezbollah conflict will occur, but how many orders of magnitude greater the damage will be,” he concludes.

Dismissing the reason mentioned in the cited article on why Hezbollah has evolved and grown into a powerful army, one thing is unmistakable and that is the inevitability of another confrontation between Hezbollah and the Israeli Occupation Force. When and if it occurs, many believe that the battle will be a decisive event in the history of the occupying Zionist regime. 

 

Tags :

Lebanon Israel Hezbollah diplomats 2006 July war ceasefire empower

Comments
Name :
Email :
* Text :
Send

Gallery

Photo

Film

Breathtaking and sad moments of Shahid Rajaee Port  Iran mourns

Breathtaking and sad moments of Shahid Rajaee Port Iran mourns