Alwaght | News & Analysis Website

Editor's Choice

News

Most Viewed

Day Week Month

In Focus

Ansarullah

Ansarullah

A Zaidi Shiite movement operating in Yemen. It seeks to establish a democratic government in Yemen.
Shiite

Shiite

represents the second largest denomination of Islam. Shiites believe Ali (peace be upon him) to be prophet"s successor in the Caliphate.
Resistance

Resistance

Axis of Resistances refers to countries and movements with common political goal, i.e., resisting against Zionist regime, America and other western powers. Iran, Syria, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and Hamas in Palestine are considered as the Axis of Resistance.
Persian Gulf Cooperation Council

Persian Gulf Cooperation Council

A regional political u n i o n consisting of Arab states of the Persian Gulf, except for Iraq.
Taliban

Taliban

Taliban is a Sunni fundamentalist movement in Afghanistan. It was founded by Mohammed Omar in 1994.
  Wahhabism & Extremism

Wahhabism & Extremism

Wahhabism is an extremist pseudo-Sunni movement, which labels non-Wahhabi Muslims as apostates thus paving the way for their bloodshed.
Kurds

Kurds

Kurds are an ethnic group in the Middle East, mostly inhabiting a region, which spans adjacent parts of Iran, Iraq, Syria, and Turkey. They are an Iranian people and speak the Kurdish languages, which form a subgroup of the Northwestern Iranian branch of Iranian languages.
NATO

NATO

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization is an intergovernmental military alliance based on the North Atlantic Treaty which was signed on 4 April 1949.
Islamic Awakening

Islamic Awakening

Refers to a revival of the Islam throughout the world, that began in 1979 by Iranian Revolution that established an Islamic republic.
Al-Qaeda

Al-Qaeda

A militant Sunni organization founded by Osama bin Laden at some point between 1988 and 1989
New node

New node

Map of  Latest Battlefield Developments in Syria and Iraq on
alwaght.net
Analysis

Challenges, Prospects of Intra-Afghan Talks in Doha

Sunday 13 September 2020
Challenges, Prospects of Intra-Afghan Talks in Doha

Related Content

Why Does Violence Continue In Afghanistan Even After Deal With Taliban?

US-Taliban Deal: Peace Agreement Or US Defeat In Afghanistan War?

US, Taliban Reach Draft Agreement in Doha Talks

Alwaght- Intra-Afghan talks, or in other words, talks between the central government of Kabul and the Taliban will begin in Qatar on Saturday. In this regard, the High Council for National Reconciliation of Afghanistan issued this statement: Afghan government delegation headed by Abdullah Abdullah to leave for Doha, Qatar on Friday to start intra-Afghan talks. In a statement, the High Council for National Reconciliation of Afghanistan expressed hope that after a long wait, the talks will be the beginning of peace and stability and the end of war and violence in Afghanistan. The Taliban also announced the dispatch of six of the group's prisoners to Doha, of which France and Australia opposed their release. With this in mind, the question now is that what are the most important areas of dialogue between the parties and to what extent is it possible for an agreement to be reached between the parties? In order to answer this essential question, Alwaght has sought the analysis of Pir-Mohammad Mollazehi, a senior expert on Afghanistan’s issues.

The Unity of Taliban in Appearance, but Fragmented from within

Pir-Mohammad Mollazehi believes that, in connection with repeated changes of the Taliban negotiating team before their trip to Qatar, the Taliban, despite appearing cohesive, have divisions within them that disagree on how a negotiation and a possible agreement with the central government should be achieved. The question of which areas the Taliban will show flexibility in and which issues are considered red lines for them is still controversial. In particular, the Quetta Council have stronger positions and are not satisfied to form a partnership in ‘power’. Although the group can gain power in the future as a democratic mechanism, they continue to put military policy on the agenda. This is at a time when another section of the Taliban believes that the current juncture is the best time to reach an agreement, given that they are at the height of their military power and have large areas under control and also the fact that the Americans support the deal. These two different perspectives can be evaluated as the most important factors for the negotiating team's numerous changes.

The Difficulty of Reaching an Agreement While Crossing Red Lines

In another part of his remarks, the pundit emphasized the availability of peace conditions and the real will of the two sides to achieve peace.

"First of all, it is important to note that the initiative is not in the hands of the Afghan government and the Taliban, but rather, in the hands of the Americans and Pakistanis who act as the main determiners of the negotiation process. In Donald Trump's view, with the US election approaching, the start of intra-Afghan negotiations would be a major foreign policy achievement for him even if unsuccessful. Thus, due to his personal benefits, he is trying to pressure both sides to come to the negotiating table. The fact is that the Taliban have repeatedly stated that they will not negotiate with the current Afghan government, especially whilst Abdullah Abdullah is in power, however, the pressure from the US and Pakistan has now led them to negotiate," Mollazehi explained.

He added that "Given that the red lines of the central government and the Taliban are very different from each other, there is little hope that an agreement between the two sides would be formed in the short term. It seems that Abdullah Abdullah is very optimistic towards this issue; Considering that the Taliban's red line is the Islamic Emirate, and the central government's red line is the constitution and the preservation of the current democracy in place. Therefore, these two different lines of thought and strategy cannot be combined, but the Taliban may seek to establish an interim government with its participation; If such an approach is taken, Abdullah Abdullah’s optimistic view will certainly not be implemented."

Donald Trump Seeks to use intra-Afghan Negotiations as a Winning Card

In another part of his remarks on the most important issues under discussion, the Afghan affairs expert clarified that "The most important issue from the government's point of view is the continuous of ceasefire; That is, the government intends to convince the Taliban to stop fighting permanently, but this is an issue that the Quetta Council is unlikely to agree on. Even if the Quetta Council accepts this, there are other groups that will not be committed to this matter, and the Haqqani Network will probably not accept this process. Nevertheless, it seems that in the next 50 days of the upcoming US election, Trump plans to use the Afghan negotiations and the normalization agreement of Arab relations with Israel as his two winning cards. Therefore, US pressure on the parties will continue in the coming days, but after the election, with Trump in office or not, Afghanistan's negotiations will no longer matter to the White House."

 

Tags :

Intra-afghan Talks Taliban Qatar

Comments
Name :
Email :
* Text :
Send

Gallery

Photo

Film

Courages Individiuals like Sinvar are on the Rise

Courages Individiuals like Sinvar are on the Rise