Alwaght | News & Analysis Website

Editor's Choice

News

Most Viewed

Day Week Month

In Focus

Ansarullah

Ansarullah

A Zaidi Shiite movement operating in Yemen. It seeks to establish a democratic government in Yemen.
Shiite

Shiite

represents the second largest denomination of Islam. Shiites believe Ali (peace be upon him) to be prophet"s successor in the Caliphate.
Resistance

Resistance

Axis of Resistances refers to countries and movements with common political goal, i.e., resisting against Zionist regime, America and other western powers. Iran, Syria, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and Hamas in Palestine are considered as the Axis of Resistance.
Persian Gulf Cooperation Council

Persian Gulf Cooperation Council

A regional political u n i o n consisting of Arab states of the Persian Gulf, except for Iraq.
Taliban

Taliban

Taliban is a Sunni fundamentalist movement in Afghanistan. It was founded by Mohammed Omar in 1994.
  Wahhabism & Extremism

Wahhabism & Extremism

Wahhabism is an extremist pseudo-Sunni movement, which labels non-Wahhabi Muslims as apostates thus paving the way for their bloodshed.
Kurds

Kurds

Kurds are an ethnic group in the Middle East, mostly inhabiting a region, which spans adjacent parts of Iran, Iraq, Syria, and Turkey. They are an Iranian people and speak the Kurdish languages, which form a subgroup of the Northwestern Iranian branch of Iranian languages.
NATO

NATO

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization is an intergovernmental military alliance based on the North Atlantic Treaty which was signed on 4 April 1949.
Islamic Awakening

Islamic Awakening

Refers to a revival of the Islam throughout the world, that began in 1979 by Iranian Revolution that established an Islamic republic.
Al-Qaeda

Al-Qaeda

A militant Sunni organization founded by Osama bin Laden at some point between 1988 and 1989
New node

New node

Map of  Latest Battlefield Developments in Syria and Iraq on
alwaght.net
Report

The Armenian Genocide Issue Exposes the Double Standards of the West

Tuesday 28 April 2015
The Armenian Genocide Issue Exposes the Double Standards of the West

Alwaght-Once again the Western powers deal with humane issues in a double standard manner according to their own benefits. This time their duality was displayed through the Armenian Genocide issue.

In 1915, during the World War 1, leaders of the Turkish government set in motion a plan to expel and massacre Armenians living in the Ottoman Empire. By the early 1920s, when the massacres and deportations finally ended, some 1.5 million of Turkey’s Armenians were dead, with many more forcibly removed from the country. Today, most historians call this event a genocide–a premeditated and systematic campaign to exterminate an entire people. However, the Turkish government does not acknowledge the enormity or scope of these events, and refuses to admit that their ancestors committed a genocide. Despite pressure from Armenians and social justice advocates throughout the world, it is still illegal in "Democratic" Turkey to talk about what happened to Armenians during this era.

The Turkish government objects to use the term “genocide”, arguing that many people of various ethnicities were killed in the chaotic war. It remains a major point of contention between Turkey and Armenia. 

US president Barack Obama has apparently come down on the side of Turkey on this matter. Despite a 2008 campaign promise to “recognize the Armenian genocide,” the White House is being extremely careful about the language it employs when broaching the anniversary.

Barack Obama described the World War I massacre of Armenians as "terrible carnage", but avoided the term genocide, as tempers flared ahead of the 100th anniversary of the bloodshed.

"The Armenian people of the Ottoman Empire were deported, massacred, and marched to their deaths. Their culture and heritage in their ancient homeland were erased," Obama said in a carefully worded statement.

He also said, "Amid horrific violence that saw suffering on all sides, one and a half million Armenians perished."

But still the White House has avoided calling the incident a genocide, though last month US lawmakers introduced a resolution urging Obama to recognize the killings as such.

The abstinence from referring to the killings as genocidal is an obvious deference to Ankara, one of the US’s most strategically valuable allies in the Middle East.

The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) from its side ruled on December 17 that denial of the 1915 mass killings of Armenians as genocide falls under freedom of expression.

This brings up a hot question to the ECHR, which is, "Is the denial of the Jewish Holocaust or being skeptical about the numbers mentioned in the fact sheets also considered freedom of expression?"

The Armenian genocide issue resembles a vivid example of the double standards at the West, where any speech against the so-called Jewish Holocaust or skepticism towards the reality of it is considered ant-Semitic speech and violation of "Human Rights", whereas when it comes to the Armenian genocide public denial of it is under freedom of expression.  

Tags :

Comments
Name :
Email :
* Text :
Send

Gallery

Photo

Film

Courages Individiuals like Sinvar are on the Rise

Courages Individiuals like Sinvar are on the Rise